- From: Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 10:46:39 -0700
- To: Andreas Kuckartz <A.Kuckartz@ping.de>
- Cc: "B. Ross Ashley" <brashley46@tfnet.ca>, public-restrictedmedia@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 11 June 2013 17:47:08 UTC
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 12:15 PM, Andreas Kuckartz <A.Kuckartz@ping.de>wrote: > B. Ross Ashley: > > On 13-06-10 09:20 AM, Emmanuel Revah wrote: > >> EME/DRM is more comparable to an alarm designed to protect home owners > >> against their own guests. > > Actually, it is even more comparable to an alarm system to defend teh > > guest against the houseowner! I am not on their machine, they are on > mine. > > +1 (I intended to write the same.) > > The houseowner will not be allowed to find out what the alarm is really > doing. It might be monitoring his house silently. Maybe on behalf of > media rights owners, maybe on behalf of the NSA, maybe on behalf of both. > Extended analogies aside, what would be a good way to address this concern ? That is, how can we give the user the _option_ to _voluntarily_ accept that certain restrictions be applied to certain data without opening the door to the security and privacy concerns expressed above ? Or, a meta question, what process would be good for exploring and answering this question ? ...Mark > > Cheers, > Andreas > >
Received on Tuesday, 11 June 2013 17:47:08 UTC