- From: Joshua Gay <jgay@fsf.org>
- Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2013 17:47:55 -0400
- To: public-restrictedmedia@w3.org
Dear Jeff, I would like to get your response to my argument in my previous email -- that the purpose of EME is to deny a user access to data and therefore this goes against the fundamental mission of EME. I would also like to emphasize that I believe this argument I have made is distinct from other arguments that have been made (for example, in my argument, EME is not analogous to proprietary media formats, since in the case of proprietary formats, a user is provided access to the data itself). And lastly, one of the reasons I think it would be most useful to address the meaning of "access" in this context, is because if my argument holds,then we could rely upon existing policy (i.e,. the mission statement of the W3C) and we wouldn't need to create new policy with regard to freedom or openness. Josh -- Joshua Gay Licensing & Compliance Manager Free Software Foundation
Received on Thursday, 6 June 2013 21:48:22 UTC