- From: Emmanuel Revah <stsil@manurevah.com>
- Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2013 11:57:58 +0200
- To: public-restrictedmedia@w3.org
I have a few questions and thoughts, they may appear naive, simplistic or may contain comprehension errors, let me know if I misunderstood. ------------------------------------------------- On W3C » Standards » Browsers and Authoring Tools - http://www.w3.org/standards/agents/Overview.html "We should be able to publish regardless of the software we use, the computer we have, the language we speak, whether we are wired or wireless, regardless of our sensory or interaction modes. We should be able to access the web from any kind of hardware that can connect to the Internet – stationary or mobile, small or large. W3C facilitates this listening and blending via international web standards. These standards ensure that all the crazy brilliance continues to improve a web that is open to us all." ------------------------------------------------- The W3 should promote specs/standards/technologies that can be used regardless of the user's choice of software (for reading or writing). Free/Open or proprietary, the choice the user will make should not be dictated by the standards. For me this isn't about Free or non-free, indeed it's not the license or source code availability that will enable/disable playback, the concerns is that the user will have to install software specifically provided by the website (CDMs, via the site or its partners(s)). Does this go against the "regardless of the software we use" idea ? ------------------------------------------------- Encrypted Media Extensions - http://www.w3.org/TR/encrypted-media/ "This proposal extends HTMLMediaElement providing APIs to control playback of protected content." [...] * Support a range of content security models, including software and hardware-based models ------------------------------------------------- Will I be able to publish EME regardless of the software I use ? Or reformulated, will it be technically possible for me to make any use of EME to control playback of protected content, without any imposition on the software required for me to implement it ? (and for visitors to read it). I am trying to understand if EME is a standard designed to be usable by everyone to read and write the W3C's definition of the web. Back to the first quote, regarding hardware + from the EME draft (1.1 Goals): ------------------------------------------------- "We should be able to access the web from any kind of hardware that can connect to the Internet" * Support a range of content security models, including software and hardware-based models ------------------------------------------------- I've understood from one of Mark Watson's emails to this list that there could be hardware implemented DRM/CDM which would allow a user's system to run only Free Software for the operating system, the playback control would be part of the GPU or some other hardware. (some may accept this others may not, but that's not my point). I also read about TrustZone http://www.arm.com/products/processors/technologies/trustzone.php which is exactly that, DRM built in to hardware. I personally do not oppose companies producing products I don't wish to purchase, it happens all the time. The question is: Would this mean that to access the web (the part of the web defined by the W3C) I may need to have specific hardware ? Would "any kind of hardware that can connect to the Internet" no longer be true. Will it become possible, using EME, to limit access to the web based on hardware ? -- Emmanuel Revah http://manurevah.com
Received on Wednesday, 5 June 2013 09:58:31 UTC