- From: Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2013 13:00:24 -0400
- To: Duncan Bayne <dhgbayne@fastmail.fm>
- CC: public-restrictedmedia@w3.org
On 7/6/2013 5:59 AM, Duncan Bayne wrote: >> Exactly. That's why finding better alternatives is not a valid argument. >> The debate here is not about DRM being bad or good. The debate is >> whether this should be a W3C standard or not. > And, from what we've been told, that was never debated at all, and won't > be. > I'm not sure what you mean when you say that it won't be debated whether this should be a W3C standard or not. This mailing list houses a fairly substantial debate: both about whether content protection should be in scope and also whether EME is an acceptable solution for that scope.
Received on Monday, 8 July 2013 17:00:33 UTC