Re: walling of the web

> We certainly are trying to find consensus.  That's why we are spending
time in this discussion.
>
I agree :-)

> I continue to search for one.
>
> Recently, for example, I proposed that we work together on an open
source, breakable CDM.  That did not find much traction on this list.
>
Mainly reason because it would be useless and wasted time, there's no real
use case that compensate the effort.

> I also enumerated other approaches to content protection on this list.
 However, I don't think anyone has proposed to the Working Group whether or
how they provide adequate protection.  I would encourage them to do so if
they have such a complete solution.
>
Well, I have read of several sugestions, some of mine, regarding use of
HTTPS, SSL certificates, non-destructive watermarks... I don't think this
issn't give ideas...

Problem is, it's mathematically proved you can't control all side channels,
so only solution would be directly implant content on consumers brains, or
assume that as they told previously, it's only needed just one guy capable
of doing a copy and share it so it's available for everybody, and try to
find solutions around this that doesn't require to have a watchmen giving
its breath on your neck ready to click the delete button or bully your
computer's monitor or call to the swat and the RIAA lawyers at any moment...