- From: Nikos Roussos <comzeradd@mozilla-community.org>
- Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2013 09:12:23 +0300
- To: public-restrictedmedia@w3.org
On Tue, 2013-07-02 at 00:30 -0400, Jeff Jaffe wrote: > On 7/1/2013 2:55 PM, piranna@gmail.com wrote: > > > > > The reasons why the Director accepted the requirement are outlined > > in my blog post on this subject. I understand that many in the Free > > Software community do not view this as valid. So on this point > > apparently we will disagree. > > > > > And since W3C is proud that its standards are defined by consensus, > > having so much confrontation should EME specification stopped until at > > least some of the differences between both sides get a common point? > > > We certainly are trying to find consensus. That's why we are spending > time in this discussion. > > I continue to search for one. > > Recently, for example, I proposed that we work together on an open > source, breakable CDM. That did not find much traction on this list. And the fact that those who are in favor of EME don't seem to be interested on implementing a (Free) Open Source CDM, should be considered as important ;)
Received on Tuesday, 2 July 2013 07:23:46 UTC