- From: <piranna@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 23:10:38 +0200
- To: Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>
- Cc: public-restrictedmedia@w3.org, Mhyst <mhysterio@gmail.com>
- Message-ID: <CAKfGGh0FqHFy8qyaNAbH24b-tCzeQcKqvQbT8D05Q1XPJGpyuw@mail.gmail.com>
I agree, it's not the place for this discussion, and I'm guilty of doing it. I only say that everybody I've talked about here at Spain or in USA, oficially or non-oficially they disagree with digital Intellectual Property laws and requeriments, and us, as technicians, we have the power of design and develop or not what our conscience dictates, not what others say to do against our principles whatever the important they are or how much they pay. Myself, for instance, I will remember until my last days that I accepted just for ego to sabotage the system I developed because my boss demanded it, or if not they would trash it and look for another to do it again from scratch (as finally it hapenned also after doing it). Luckily it was not a critical system, but I should have tell it to autorities instead of change my system so it could work also in a situation where people was in danger. El 21/08/2013 22:20, "Mark Watson" <watsonm@netflix.com> escribió: > > > > On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 1:03 PM, piranna@gmail.com <piranna@gmail.com>wrote: > >> > But until then, in W3C, we should work with the world as it is today, >> surely ? >> > >> Honestly, I don't think so. We are technicians, it's supossed we can >> design how we like the future to be... > > > Technically, sure. But legally, no. That is the job of elected politicians > (at least in democracies). Arguments of the form "copyright and other laws > aren't fair and should be changed" are not really in scope here. > > ...Mark > >
Received on Wednesday, 21 August 2013 21:11:05 UTC