Re: W3C mock's users [via Restricted Media Community Group]

> Members of W3C pay according to a well defined schedule which gives them 
> full Membership privileges.  No extra money has been paid for anything 
> related to EME.
> 
> W3C Director, Tim Berners-Lee decides on the scope of Working Groups.  I 
> find it pretty offensive that someone would suggest that he makes these 
> decisions based on money paid.

I'm sorry if my post seemed to be making that claim.  That was
definitely not my intent.

Rather, I was claiming that the richer, more prominent members of the
W3C seem to have a disproportionate influence in such scope decisions. 
I'm not saying that they are literally paying for influence; I don't
believe that either you or the Director would stand for that.  

What I'm saying is that - by virtue of their wealth and influence in the
industry - they appear to have set the terms of this work & the
surrounding discussion from the outset.

This is the 'crisis of representation' that was discussed in the article
I linked to in my post.  

The same thing plays out in other organisations; even without 'campaign
donations', the CEO of a billion-dollar company is going to be able to
talk personally with the Prime Minister, and as the founder of a two-man
startup, I'm not.

-- 
Duncan Bayne
ph: +61 420817082 | web: http://duncan-bayne.github.com/ | skype:
duncan_bayne

I usually check my mail every 24 - 48 hours.  If there's something
urgent going on, please send me an SMS or call me at the above number.

Received on Tuesday, 20 August 2013 01:43:07 UTC