- From: Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 21:29:14 -0400
- To: Mhyst <mhysterio@gmail.com>
- CC: public-restrictedmedia@w3.org
On 8/19/2013 9:23 PM, Mhyst wrote: > He was trying to brief me the whole thing... which I appreciate. > The basic thing is like he said, isn't it? > > Now if I ask you, Jeff, how much money do they pay (the interested > companies, obviously) you for allowing this nonsense... would you > consider offensive as well? Certainly, that question is at least uninformed. Members of W3C pay according to a well defined schedule which gives them full Membership privileges. No extra money has been paid for anything related to EME. W3C Director, Tim Berners-Lee decides on the scope of Working Groups. I find it pretty offensive that someone would suggest that he makes these decisions based on money paid. His decision to make the web open; rather than used for his proprietary advantage certainly disproves your theory. > > Well, I don't pretend to insult you. Not at all. I just try to > understand how things went this way. That's all. > > In my opinion, there should be a previous consensus before starting to > consider the best way to implement (define) EME. > I'm here just two days and I don't see that so called consensus about > the matter. So why are we supposed to talk about the better approaches > to define EME? >
Received on Tuesday, 20 August 2013 01:29:15 UTC