- From: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 10:32:10 -0700
- To: "public-restrictedmedia@w3.org" <public-restrictedmedia@w3.org>
On Aug 18, 2013, at 19:30 , Julio Cesar Serrano <mhysterio@gmail.com> wrote: > When I read W3C arguments, I read everywhere "protected content". What is this? > Mockery? That is just propaganda to try to tip the scales towards the wishes of > the industry. Why don't they say "paid content"? Web content is there to be > seen. Content needs not to be protected in any way. To state it plainly […] Oh boy. The W3C is just the members, plus the staff, so to impute any stance to it is strange. Then, there is a difference between paid content and protected content; there is content that is paid for that is not protected, and I can certainly imagine uses where free content is nonetheless protected. There is no mocking going on that I see (well, sometimes the conversation gets a little warm, but it's a subject that is both interesting and a focus for strong opinions). But, in case of any doubt, let's keep the conversation productive and professional! David Singer Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc.
Received on Monday, 19 August 2013 17:32:36 UTC