- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 20:11:05 -0700
- To: Jason Grigsby <jason@cloudfour.com>
- Cc: Marcos Caceres <marcos@marcosc.com>, Mat Marquis <mat@matmarquis.com>, Yoav Weiss <yoav@yoav.ws>, "public-respimg@w3.org" <public-respimg@w3.org>
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 7:37 PM, Jason Grigsby <jason@cloudfour.com> wrote: > Is that the right spec being referenced? The bug references "CSS Image > Values and Replaced Content Module Level 4" with a link to > http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-images/ > > But I see image-set in CSS Image Values and Replaced Content Module Level 3 > not Level 4: > http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-images-3/#image-set-notation > > I was going to put this in the ticket itself, but nothing about the ticket > references image-set so I was unsure whether your link to the bug was > pointing at the wrong bugzilla ticket or if the bugzilla ticket was pointing > at the wrong spec. > > Or I'm crazy. :-) I recently shifted things around; keeping up a full level 3 and level 4 spec, and porting fixes to both, was too much trouble and I wasn't actually doing it. Instead level 4 is now a delta spec unless it's being actively published, and a few things moved to level 3 that were "stable" since the last level 3 publication a few years ago. image-set() is one of the things that I shifted to level 3. ~TJ
Received on Saturday, 25 October 2014 03:11:52 UTC