W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-respimg@w3.org > October 2014

Re: Status of CSS image-set()

From: Jason Grigsby <jason@cloudfour.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 17:57:09 -0700
Message-ID: <CADQU=pPJAvQJ1Kk6YP4cCghYbyKNF56Lz0OYPWztPbpKSCgYqg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mat Marquis <mat@matmarquis.com>
Cc: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Yoav Weiss <yoav@yoav.ws>, "public-respimg@w3.org" <public-respimg@w3.org>
I couldn't find any mention of image-set in the issues or roadmaps of
Firefox and IE. Should I be looking for it under some other name? Or is it
something that isn't even on their radars?

On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Mat Marquis <mat@matmarquis.com> wrote:

>
> On Oct 23, 2014, at 4:36 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Yoav Weiss <yoav@yoav.ws> wrote:
> >> Tab Atkins would know more regarding the spec's state.
> >> As far as I can see from the code, Blink & WebKit only support the
> "-webkit"
> >> prefixed version of the syntax. I'm not aware of any other rendering
> engine
> >> that does.
> >
> > WebKit supports it prefixed, no one else does.  The current feature
> > set/syntax is stable.  I'd like to add a bit more to make it equal in
> > power to the <picture> element, but that wont' interfere with its
> > current syntax, which matches early srcset and does a decent job.
> >
> > ~TJ
> >
>
>
> Strongly in favor of getting some of the advanced `srcset` functionality
> specced for `img` into `image-set()`. Out-of-context +1 to sneaking in
> `type()`, too—I know you’ve brought that up a couple times before.
>
> -M




-- 
+1 (503) 290-1090 o | +1 (503) 502-7211 m | http://cloudfour.com
Received on Friday, 24 October 2014 00:57:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:06:15 UTC