- From: Mat Marquis <mat@matmarquis.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 16:44:50 -0400
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: Yoav Weiss <yoav@yoav.ws>, Jason Grigsby <jason@cloudfour.com>, "public-respimg@w3.org" <public-respimg@w3.org>
On Oct 23, 2014, at 4:36 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Yoav Weiss <yoav@yoav.ws> wrote: >> Tab Atkins would know more regarding the spec's state. >> As far as I can see from the code, Blink & WebKit only support the "-webkit" >> prefixed version of the syntax. I'm not aware of any other rendering engine >> that does. > > WebKit supports it prefixed, no one else does. The current feature > set/syntax is stable. I'd like to add a bit more to make it equal in > power to the <picture> element, but that wont' interfere with its > current syntax, which matches early srcset and does a decent job. > > ~TJ > Strongly in favor of getting some of the advanced `srcset` functionality specced for `img` into `image-set()`. Out-of-context +1 to sneaking in `type()`, too—I know you’ve brought that up a couple times before. -M
Received on Thursday, 23 October 2014 20:45:15 UTC