On Thursday, 7. February 2013 at 10:11, Robin Berjon wrote: > On 06/02/2013 23:39 , Silvia Pfeiffer wrote: > > I'm not sure if you saw this on the thread about the picture element > > CfC: after understanding that the two specifications are not competing > > with each other but are meant to complete each other to cover the > > responsive images use cases, I was left to wonder why we have two > > separate specifications. > > > > > There's still some open discussion about which use cases need to be > tackled, and how. > > > While this is true, both specifications currently tackle different use-cases and for now are not yet fully compatible to each other. This should be fixed by next weeks but the use-cases will always be different: - picture is for art-direction mainly and is a completely new element while - the srcset attribute is an attribute which should be usable on picture and img element. For that I think authoring both specifications together to reach a good goal is important but I don't think we should merge both specifications into one covering all. -- Anselm Hannemann – @helloanselm > > Would be able to work with picture element proponents to come up with > > one specification to cover a broader range of the user cases? > > > > > I think that's precisely the plan! > > -- > Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon > > >
Received on Thursday, 7 February 2013 09:34:39 UTC