On 06/02/2013 23:39 , Silvia Pfeiffer wrote: > I'm not sure if you saw this on the thread about the picture element > CfC: after understanding that the two specifications are not competing > with each other but are meant to complete each other to cover the > responsive images use cases, I was left to wonder why we have two > separate specifications. There's still some open discussion about which use cases need to be tackled, and how. > Would be able to work with picture element proponents to come up with > one specification to cover a broader range of the user cases? I think that's precisely the plan! -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjonReceived on Thursday, 7 February 2013 09:11:34 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:06:08 UTC