- From: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>
- Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 22:23:57 +0200
- To: François REMY <fremycompany_pub@yahoo.fr>,Marcos Caceres <marcosscaceres@gmail.com>,public-respimg@w3.org
- CC: CSS WG <www-style@w3.org>
Hi all, Sorry if by keeping on improving media queries, the csswg keeps on making you even more disappointed that the whatwg won't let you use them for content images :-P Jokes aside, there is really little I can do on that front. I've tried throwing some ideas in a while ago, but it doesn't seem that this made much of a difference. Anyway, if you have some feedback about the the new proposed media queries, (or ideas about new ones), this is certainly most welcome. Be sure to send that to www-style@w3.org though, as I'm afraid I don't have the bandwidth to follow messages on public-respimg@w3.org. -Florian "François REMY" <fremycompany_pub@yahoo.fr> wrote: >For what it's worth, the CSS WG just added a way to handle "ambiant >luminosity" media features in Media Queries Level 4 [1], and there's a >proposal to merge/complement that with the "high-contrast" media >features >from Microsoft. Maybe there should be a joint effort here to specify >the >need and come with a joint solution. People from the accessibility >front are >still to give their opinion on a possible merge of those media queries. > >I put the editor of CSS Media Queries (Florian Rivoal) in carbon copy >of >this mail so that he can follow this thread [2]. > > >________________________________________ >[1] http://dev.w3.org/csswg/mediaqueries4/ >[2] http://www.w3.org/mid/CDA25383BBDF46DDA7DC093ECA1F01EF@gmail.com
Received on Thursday, 25 October 2012 20:24:29 UTC