- From: Adrian Pohl <pohl@hbz-nrw.de>
- Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2023 08:19:51 +0100
- To: public-reconciliation@w3.org
Hi Antonin, hi all, I am happy to add to the list. Steffen Rörtgen, Fabian's and my colleague in our group at hbz, has developed SkoHub Reconcile, based on a prototype by Andreas Wagner of Max Planck Institute for Legal History and Legal Theory. SkoHUb Reconcile is a generic service that facilitates setting up a reconciliation service API for a controlled vocabulary if it exists in RDF modelled with SKOS (Simple Knowledge Organization System): https://github.com/skohub-io/skohub-reconcile There is a separate repo skohub-reconcile-publish, for a web service that can be used to publish vocabularies as Turtle Files to the SkoHub Reconcile service: https://github.com/skohub-io/skohub-reconcile-publish The whole thing can be tested at https://reconcile-publish.skohub.io/ where you can select a turtle file, upload it and get back the URL of a reconciliation service which you can then use e.g. for reconciliation in OpenRefine. In the Journal for Digital Legal History a tutorial was published that describes how to use SkoHub Vocabs plus skohub-reconcile for publication of a SKOS vocabulary and setting up and using a reconciliation endpoint: Romein, C. A. & Wagner, A. & van Zundert, J. J., (2023) “Building and Deploying a Classification Schema using Open Standards and Technology”, Journal for Digital Legal History 2(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.21825/dlh.85751 We somehow missed to blog about this ourselves and will publish a post on https://blog.skohub.io/ in January. All the best Adrian Am 14.12.23 um 16:59 schrieb Antonin Delpeuch: > Hello all, > > I noticed we haven't published a blog post on > https://www.w3.org/community/reconciliation/ for a while. I thought > about writing one, highlighting a few things which have been happening > around the reconciliation protocol over the past year. > > I need your help to collect those things! So far, I could come up with > the following (which I would develop in paragraphs for a blog post): > > - our group was active this year, continuing our improvements of the > specifications on various fronts (including publishing final specs for > the 0.1 and 0.2 versions of the protocol) > > - a new Global Names reconciliation service was published. See > https://github.com/gnames/gnverifier/wiki/OpenRefine-readme > > - a reconciliation service for the Répertoire International des Sources > Musicales (RISM) was created. See > https://rism.online/docs/reconciliation/introduction/ > > - thanks to a grant from the NFDI4Culture consortium, OpenRefine > improved the user experience of its reconciliation feature (to be > released in the upcoming 3.8 version). > > Anything else we should mention? Even small improvements in existing > clients or reconciliation services are worth sharing. > > Cheers, > > Antonin > >
Received on Friday, 15 December 2023 07:20:25 UTC