Re: Yearly round-up of reconciliation-related activities

Hi Antonin, hi all,

I am happy to add to the list.

Steffen Rörtgen, Fabian's and my colleague in our group at hbz, has 
developed SkoHub Reconcile, based on a prototype by Andreas Wagner of 
Max Planck Institute for Legal History and Legal Theory. SkoHUb 
Reconcile is a generic service that facilitates setting up a 
reconciliation service API for a controlled vocabulary if it exists in 
RDF modelled with SKOS (Simple Knowledge Organization System):

https://github.com/skohub-io/skohub-reconcile

There is a separate repo skohub-reconcile-publish, for a web service 
that can be used to publish vocabularies as Turtle Files to the SkoHub 
Reconcile service:

https://github.com/skohub-io/skohub-reconcile-publish

The whole thing can be tested at https://reconcile-publish.skohub.io/ 
where you can select a turtle file, upload it and get back the URL of a 
reconciliation service which you can then use e.g. for reconciliation in 
OpenRefine.

In the Journal for Digital Legal History a tutorial was published that 
describes how to use SkoHub Vocabs plus skohub-reconcile for publication 
of a SKOS vocabulary and setting up and using a reconciliation endpoint:

Romein, C. A. & Wagner, A. & van Zundert, J. J., (2023) “Building and 
Deploying a Classification Schema using Open Standards and Technology”, 
Journal for Digital Legal History 2(1). doi: 
https://doi.org/10.21825/dlh.85751

We somehow missed to blog about this ourselves and will publish a post 
on https://blog.skohub.io/ in January.

All the best
Adrian

Am 14.12.23 um 16:59 schrieb Antonin Delpeuch:
> Hello all,
> 
> I noticed we haven't published a blog post on 
> https://www.w3.org/community/reconciliation/ for a while. I thought 
> about writing one, highlighting a few things which have been happening 
> around the reconciliation protocol over the past year.
> 
> I need your help to collect those things! So far, I could come up with 
> the following (which I would develop in paragraphs for a blog post):
> 
> - our group was active this year, continuing our improvements of the 
> specifications on various fronts (including publishing final specs for 
> the 0.1 and 0.2 versions of the protocol)
> 
> - a new Global Names reconciliation service was published. See 
> https://github.com/gnames/gnverifier/wiki/OpenRefine-readme
> 
> - a reconciliation service for the Répertoire International des Sources 
> Musicales (RISM) was created. See 
> https://rism.online/docs/reconciliation/introduction/
> 
> - thanks to a grant from the NFDI4Culture consortium, OpenRefine 
> improved the user experience of its reconciliation feature (to be 
> released in the upcoming 3.8 version).
> 
> Anything else we should mention? Even small improvements in existing 
> clients or reconciliation services are worth sharing.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Antonin
> 
>

Received on Friday, 15 December 2023 07:20:25 UTC