Re: canonical representation from bergi on 2016-01-14 (public-rdfjs@w3.org from January 2016)

From: bergi <bergi@axolotlfarm.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 10:04:25 +0100
To: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>, Dave Longley <dlongley@digitalbazaar.com>
Cc: "public-rdfjs@w3.org" <public-rdfjs@w3.org>, public-linked-json@w3.org
Message-ID: <56976499.5020807@axolotlfarm.org>

Thanks for pointing to the "4. A Canonical form of N-Triples" section of
the N-Triples spec. I think it's new in the 1.1. version.

I would propose to use that form in the JS RDF Representation spec.

Am 12.01.2016 um 03:53 schrieb Gregg Kellogg:
> 
> Note that the spec defines a “normalized dataset”, which is a
> restriction on an RDF dataset where all blank nodes are labeled with
> stable identifiers. There should also be a canonical serialization
> format defined, which will/should be canonical N-Quads. (Note, that
> N-Quads doesn’t define this, but N-Triples defines “Canonical
> N-Triples” [1], which we can use for an internal definition).
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/n-triples/#canonical-ntriples
>

Received on Thursday, 14 January 2016 09:04:10 UTC