Re: canonical representation

I'll have to study better the escaping problem... was not aware of that.

On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 3:55 PM, bergi <bergi@axolotlfarm.org> wrote:

> Hi everyone and happy new year,
>
> Am 04.01.2016 um 17:25 schrieb Piero Savastano:
> > Hi Ruben and RDFJS, happy new year :)
> >
> >     What we are looking for is:
> >     – a name for this method or property
> >        – current suggestions include .toCanonical() and .toNT()
> >
> >
> > My preference is (in order):
> > .canonical() - or directly as attribute - canonical
>
> +1, that would also align with the other methods, like .iri, .blankNode,
> etc. without "create" prefix.
>
> >
> >     – values this method or property should return
> >         – e.g., "IRIs are surrounded by angular brackets"
> >
> >
> > I would go for following as much as possible the N-quads format, with
> > the addition of ?variables just as they are expressed in SPARQL
> >
> > <...> for IRIS, no prefixes
> > "..." for literals
> > ?... for variables
>
> +1, but we have to define the escaping, like Ruben mentioned in the
> other mail. I vote for this, because:
>
> - reduces the code of a core library
> - could be reused for [1] RDF Dataset Normalization
>
> bergi
>
> [1] http://json-ld.github.io/normalization/spec/
>
>


-- 
http://pieroit.org/portfolio
+39 320 09 23 630