- From: Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be>
- Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 17:30:02 +0100
- To: Piero Savastano <piero.savastano@gmail.com>
- Cc: RDF-JS <public-rdfjs@w3.org>
Hi Piero, Thanks for your vote! > I would go for following as much as possible the N-quads format, Note: something we discussed in the group is that N-Quads can have different representations for the same string, due to escape sequences. So if we go the N-Triples route, we still have to decide what to do with escaping. One option is to _not_ have any escaping; the resulting strings are then possibly invalid N-Triples, but they would be much easier to compare and generate. > I see a risk in having a different canonical for triples that are practically the same, for example: > ?movie <http://schema.org/name> "The real history of the marshmellow"@en > ?movie <http://schema.org/name> "The real history of the marshmellow" That would be a feature, not a bug ;-) Best, Ruben
Received on Monday, 4 January 2016 16:30:37 UTC