- From: ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>
- Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 11:45:34 +0200
- To: Austin William Wright <aaa@bzfx.net>
- CC: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>, "public-rdfjs@w3.org" <public-rdfjs@w3.org>
Hi Austin, On 09/22/2015 09:21 AM, Austin William Wright wrote: > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 12:08 AM, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ < > perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org> wrote: > >> >>> RDF Interfaces was REC track before it was stopped. Is there anything >> else >>> left to add? >> What do you think about starting a dedicated thread for discussing RDF >> Interfaces? I would prefer if we could keep this thread focused on >> October meeting (agenda + date + choosing VoIP system). Thank you for >> your consideration! >> >> > The request is to add RDF Interfaces to the agenda, in addition to > reviewing APIs in general. Melvin was raising the point that RDF Interfaces > was mostly completed work, but there's many things we've learned since > then, and updates to make (we discussed some details amongst ourselves: > Streams API, an asynchronous API, RDFa integrations, and of course RDF 1.1 > updates, among others). Could you please simply edit proposed agenda: https://github.com/rdfjs/rdfjs.org/wiki/Meetings Personally I would find it practical to use this common time to decide on our workflow, choose online workspaces we will use and then everyone hopefully taking some ACTION-ables eg. writing clear charter, mapping current ecosystem of libraries/tools/applications, coordinating work on RDF Interfaces etc. If we all add proposals for agenda at least 1 week *prior* the actual meeting. We can prioritize topics via chat/list and than hopefully agree on ordered list in first few minutes of the call :) Cheers!
Received on Tuesday, 22 September 2015 09:45:37 UTC