- From: ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>
- Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 09:08:35 +0200
- To: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- CC: Austin William Wright <aaa@bzfx.net>, "public-rdfjs@w3.org" <public-rdfjs@w3.org>
On 09/22/2015 12:22 AM, Melvin Carvalho wrote: > On 21 September 2015 at 23:47, Austin William Wright <aaa@bzfx.net> wrote: > >> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 2:00 PM, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ < >> perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org> wrote: >> >>> So far only 5 replies but already Oct 8th (Thu) and 9th (Fri) look >>> promising! Anyone else would like to add availability before we choose >>> the final date for this meeting? >>> >>> Cheers! >>> >> >> Either of those look good for me! >> >> I would suggest starting work on a Note or at least wiki page containing >> specific use-cases of applications. Use-cases would be selected to >> represent the widest variety of applications: Queries against a remote data >> source, scanning RDFa content, manipulating hypertext based on a graph, and >> publishing and consuming graph data formats, like JSON-LD, in a >> forward-compatible manner (e.g. reading data off the parsed graph and not >> the JSON or DOM tree). >> >> I'm also interested in resuming work on RDF Interfaces, and exploring >> methods of asynchronous queries against graphs. >> >> One of my use-cases I would like to define, is the ability to build a >> hypermedia document from a template, variable bindings (a typical template >> setup so far), but the template would contain RDFa, and unbound variables >> would be filled in from a graph database. I tried doing something like this >> before, and was somewhat successful, but it was all ECMAScript/Node.js and >> the infrastructure to grow out wasn't there. Now Facebook has released >> something similar for React, just without the URIs. I think I'll detail >> more in a post in the near future. >> > > RDF Interfaces was REC track before it was stopped. Is there anything else > left to add? What do you think about starting a dedicated thread for discussing RDF Interfaces? I would prefer if we could keep this thread focused on October meeting (agenda + date + choosing VoIP system). Thank you for your consideration!
Received on Tuesday, 22 September 2015 07:08:40 UTC