- From: Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be>
- Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 13:47:10 +0000
- To: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- Cc: Adrian Gschwend <ktk@netlabs.org>, "public-rdfjs@w3.org" <public-rdfjs@w3.org>
> But if we are to pick a winner, W3C RECs should probably be supported which means RDF/XML and Turtle, and we have parsers for them already. We can get ready for JSON LD when it goes to REC. Oh waw yes… why did we overlook that option. Just exchange Turtle, it's a standard after all. (Voids my argument though about using parser X and query engine Y.) > I'm slightly baffled why we have so many libraries doing the same thing … Different non-functional requirements. See the thread at: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfjs/2013Oct/0026.html Best, Ruben
Received on Wednesday, 11 December 2013 13:47:44 UTC