- From: Adrian Gschwend <ktk@netlabs.org>
- Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 02:40:04 +0100
- To: public-rdfjs@w3.org
- Message-ID: <52A7C274.4070601@netlabs.org>
On 11.12.13 00:06, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ wrote: Hi, > I didn't yet look into all the parsers/serializers listed at our wiki, > only in some parts of jsonld.js so far. I wonder if it would make sense > to use common way of representing deserialized RDF in javascript. Ruben > already touched topic of "URIs and literals" and I would like to take it > all the way into representing datasets with named graphs, blank nodes etc. Great timing, I wanted to write an email about this topic this week after a discussion last week with my co-worker Michael :-) > I would find it very cool if while using all those parsers/serializes we > could keep common representation of deserialized dataset. Also we could > support each other when it comes to working with modeling some complex > topics like: I'm not sure if we can convince everyone that this is a good idea but we don't have to. In the end it's a win if some active people agree on one format and use that for the parsers/serializers/SPARQL implementations on top of it & maintained by active people in here. I'm just not sure if we can agree on something for more than JS, as I would focus on performance in JavaScript for whatever model we choose. regards Adrian -- Adrian Gschwend @ netlabs.org ktk [a t] netlabs.org ------- Open Source Project http://www.netlabs.org
Received on Wednesday, 11 December 2013 01:40:43 UTC