- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 15:46:58 +0100
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Cc: RDFa Discussion <public-rdfa@w3.org>, Charles McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru>
It's not a simple matter of 'putting the site onto github'; there's a pile of software involved that needs reworking and rethinking before it could usefully be shared. All the recent source files for additions to schema.org are expressed in RDFa+RDFS and are available in the W3C Mercurial repo. As you well know schema.org recently added JSON-LD examples (around Actions); in general, discussing JSON-LD took time out that could have gone on RDFa. There's also a first cut at RDFa versions of schema.org's microdata examples in Mercurial at W3C too. I'm looking to revisit that idea in a way that would support translation into other languages, as well as alternate formats. Microdata is published on 4+ million domains - reports of its death are somewhat exaggerated, and inflamatory talk of 'downward spirals' does nobody any favours. Microdata deserves a stable specification at W3C; whether as REC, NOTE or a .txt file. The Microdata *API* on the other hand does indeed appear to be on its way out - but let's try to learn from that rather than use it for rhetorical point-scoring. This would be a very very good time to revisit the question of a .js API for structured data that abstracts away from the question of Microdata vs RDFa 1.0 vs RDFa 1.1. Is http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-api/ dead? Any lessons learned? Dan On 16 August 2013 14:50, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote: > Hey Dan, Chaals, > > I wanted to point out this thread on G+ about schema.org and how regular > Web developers view what schema.org's preferences are wrt. RDFa Lite: > > https://plus.google.com/u/0/106943062990152739506/posts/aeBhzwBoa2q > > It was triggered by a blog post I did yesterday: > > http://manu.sporny.org/2013/microdata-downward-spiral/ > > I know I keep harping on this, but it doesn't make it any less true: > > Web developers are going to use whatever the search engines tell them to > use, and right now the message is clear: Use Microdata. > > Unfortunately, all of the fears I had about how schema.org was being > built have now come to pass... the idea that Microdata is the only > choice for schema.org is locked into many Web devs minds, and it's going > to be very, very hard to undo the damage: > > http://manu.sporny.org/2011/false-choice/ > > If you guys truly want to have a level playing field here, update the > docs, add RDFa examples. We've offered countless times to help > accelerate this process if you guys would just open the site up for > public contribution via source control - please put the site on github - > we'll help do these long overdue updates. > > -- manu > > -- > Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny) > Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. > blog: Meritora - Web payments commercial launch > http://blog.meritora.com/launch/
Received on Friday, 16 August 2013 14:47:26 UTC