- From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
- Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 13:00:05 -0400
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- CC: public-rdfa <public-rdfa@w3.org>, Thomas Baker <tom@tombaker.org>, "hugh@hubns.com" <hugh@hubns.com>
I'd be happy to help consult on what needs to be done. I'll try to get the environment going, but I might be more effective as a resource to help resolve issues or provide some direction. Checking out the repo now. Gregg On May 10, 2012, at 9:52 AM, Dan Brickley wrote: > Hi folks > > I'm talking with Tom Baker of Dublin Core (cc:'d), about improving the > Dublin Core terms vocabulary documentation. > > At the moment, if you try to fetch e.g. > http://purl.org/dc/terms/creator you end up with RDF/XML > > Meanwhile there is a rich and detailed HTML document at > http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/ that describes each of > these terms. > > The HTML is generated using some XSLT-based tools (+ Java Ant build > machinery etc.). Some time ago, it was posted into Github (with Manu's > help I believe) and there was a partial effort at adding RDFa. > > Since the RDFa 1.1 work is now all-but complete, it would be great to > migrate DC's documentation to use inline RDFa 1.1 (ideally Lite) for > per-term documentation, so a single page could be both human and > machine documentation. > > Would anyone here be willing to help get this done? I'm copying Hugh > Barnes who started some work on this (Hugh - if you're interested in > picking this up again that would be really great!). > > See https://github.com/hughbris/website for the partial RDFa fork; > https://github.com/dublincore/website for the main branch. Tom has > some updated config files which he could commit or otherwise pass > along. > > If you check out the repo and have java ant set up, you should be able > to build the HTML by typing 'ant' then looking at > build/html/dcmi-terms/index.shtml ... and then start to figure out > how it's made by looking at web/xsl/html-dcmiterms.xsl > > It would be great to have DC updated for RDFa. Longer term DC is > looking into a more complete solution for it's vocab management needs. > The idea here is more of a quick-fix to bring DC into the age of RDFa. > I'd try it myself but I've my hands full with schema.org and FOAF... > > Thanks for any help, > > Dan >
Received on Thursday, 10 May 2012 17:01:01 UTC