Re: ISSUE-120 rdfa-prefixes - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals from Sam Ruby on 2011-03-02 (public-rdfa@w3.org from March 2011)

From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 17:20:33 -0500
To: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
CC: public-html@w3.org, public-rdfa@w3.org
Message-ID: <4D6EC2B1.5020707@intertwingly.net>

On 03/02/2011 04:23 PM, Danny Ayers wrote:
>
> So instead of formalising my own proposal, I'd like to express my
> support for RDFaPrefixesNoChange.

For those who have recently joined the group, I'd like to draw your 
attention to a standard part of every survey we issue (example[1]):

    This is not a popularity contest. The Working Group Decision
    will be based on the strength of objections, not the number
    of people expressing them.

> Cheers,
> Danny.

[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/issue-126-objection-poll/#wbsq1

Received on Wednesday, 2 March 2011 22:21:04 UTC