W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa@w3.org > March 2010

Re: rev and the costs of inverses/aliases in SPARQL

From: Steven Pemberton <Steven.Pemberton@cwi.nl>
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2010 16:37:34 +0100
To: "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>, public-sparql-dev <public-sparql-dev@w3.org>, public-rdfa <public-rdfa@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.u889owlmsmjzpq@steven-750g.wlan.cwi.nl>
On Mon, 08 Mar 2010 16:00:42 +0100, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> wrote:

> Would the RDFa authoring community miss a/@rev if it went away?
> Does anyone have 1st-hand experience to share?

Of course we would! Removing @rev from HTML5 is one of the worst examples  
of cow-path design: apparently on the web, @rev is "hardly ever used" and  
so therefore should be removed, whether or not anyone has a use case for  

But in any case, authors do need it, they do use it, and @rev will always  
be in RDFa, so the question is moot in a way.

Received on Monday, 8 March 2010 15:38:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:04:45 UTC