- From: John Graybeal <graybeal@mbari.org>
- Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 20:37:26 -0800
- To: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>
- Cc: "public-rdfa@w3.org" <public-rdfa@w3.org>, semantic-web@w3.org
yes, more. :-> This may go waaay beyond what you are thinking, but MBARI and others in marine science found the existing photo metadata capabilities were thoroughly insufficient for science purposes. We developed a more extended set of metadata that we are storing in XMP for our photos; you can find this specification described at http://marinemetadata.org/community/teams/imagemd-censeam/censeammetadatastandard Your comments would be welcome, and your adoption of as many of these fields as feasible would be even more pleasing. John On Feb 20, 2009, at 1:10 PM, Ben Adida wrote: > > Hi semweb and RDFa folks, > > Creative Commons is interested in providing guidance on how to mark up > photos online in great detail, using RDFa. We've started, but I > thought > we'd check in with folks here to get some more eyes on the problem. > > Here's our first take: > > http://labs.creativecommons.org/~nathan/image-rdfa/madeline.html > > (Nathan, your dog is now famous. Next time, it will be my dog.) > > We're trying to mark up: > - license and license attribution > - title > - description > - creator > - tags > - geo > - more? > > Are we using the vocabularies correctly? Are there other > vocabularies we > should consider for the advanced example? > > Thanks! > > -Ben > > PS: I'll take this opportunity to note what I still find awesome about > RDF and RDFa: even an RDFa syntax expert can and should ask for help > on > vocabularies, as those are two very different realms of expertise. > John -------------- John Graybeal <mailto:graybeal@mbari.org> -- 831-775-1956 Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute Marine Metadata Interoperability Project: http://marinemetadata.org
Received on Saturday, 21 February 2009 04:38:24 UTC