- From: Karl Dubost <karl+w3c@la-grange.net>
- Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 06:42:30 +0900
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Cc: RDFa mailing list <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, RDFa Community <public-rdfa@w3.org>
Le 14 févr. 2009 à 14:04, Manu Sporny a écrit : > http://rdfa.info/wiki/rdfa-use-cases One issue that Dom had with video transcripts that he solved with RDFa. On Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 GMT In Don’t call me DOM » The beauty of HTMLMediaElement At http://people.w3.org/~dom/archives/2009/02/the-beauty-of-htmlmediaelement/ > Given that these metadata were not stored in the > TimedText file, I ended up having them embedded in > the resulting HTML page; it occured to me that the > best combination to store them there was to use > the extremely experimental media fragment syntax > within an RDFa description of the table of > content, e.g.: > <ul class="toc"> > <li > about="http://media.w3.org/2007/11/parisweb-dom.ogvt=00:00:44.209,00:01:28.432 > "> > <a target="slides" > rel="foaf:depiction" > property="dc:title" > > href="http://www.w3.org/2007/Talks/11-parisweb/slide-1.html"> > Introduction > </a> > </li> > </ul> > > This essentially annotates a given section of the > video (t=00:00:44.209,00:01:28.432 meaning > between 44.209 seconds after the start of the > video and 1 minute 28.432 second after the start) > with a title and an illustration (in this case, > the accompanying slide) - I chose foaf:depiction > as a property, but it probably isn’t the best > match - I’m hoping thet Media Annotations Working > Group will come up with a useful ontology that > could be used in these types of contexts. > -- Karl Dubost Montréal, QC, Canada http://twitter.com/karlpro
Received on Saturday, 14 February 2009 21:42:52 UTC