- From: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 00:51:26 +0000
- To: Shlomi Fish <shlomif@iglu.org.il>
- Cc: public-rdfa@w3.org
On Thu, 2009-12-31 at 00:42 +0200, Shlomi Fish wrote: > XHTML, MathML, SVG, RDFa, etc. and still validate. I'm looking for a > good DTD definition. Ah, I see. As far as I know, nobody has bothered to create one. Someone would need to take: http://www.w3.org/TR/XHTMLplusMathMLplusSVG/ And add in the RDFa module. (Adding the Role attribute module too might be nice.) That said, DTD validation doesn't really work with RDFa, or indeed any namespaced XML, because DTDs are namespace-unaware. (The W3C validator hides a few namespace-related error messages, so you might not notice how poorly DTD-based validation works for namespaced documents.) A Relax NG schema might be of better practical use for authors wishing to check XHTML+MathML+SVG+RDFa documents. -- Toby A Inkster <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk> <http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
Received on Thursday, 31 December 2009 00:52:11 UTC