Re: STRAW POLL: Keep the Property Copying feature in HTML+RDFa 1.1

+0 - I don't find this feature compelling in either microdata nor RDFa, but
I won't stand in the way.

On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 10:54 PM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:

> +1
>
> Ivan
>
> ---
> Ivan Herman
> Tel:+31 641044153
> http://www.ivan-herman.net
>
> (Written on mobile, sorry for brevity and misspellings...)
>
>
>
> On 18 Mar 2013, at 01:07, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote:
>
> > HTML+RDFa 1.1 introduces a new feature called Property Copying which
> > provides equivalent functionality to Microdata's @itemref feature. The
> > feature was marked as at-risk when we entered Last Call in February. The
> > WG needs to decide if we're going to continue to keep this feature, or
> > remove it from the specification. There was no feedback asking the WG to
> > remove the feature. The WG unanimously polled[1] in favor of adding the
> > feature to the specification.
> >
> > PROPOSAL: Keep the Property Copying feature in the HTML+RDFa 1.1
> > specification.
> >
> > All WG members, please +1/-1/+0 the proposal above.
> >
> > -- manu
> >
> > [1] http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/meetings/2013-01-17#resolution_1
> >
> > --
> > Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny)
> > Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
> > blog: Aaron Swartz, PaySwarm, and Academic Journals
> > http://manu.sporny.org/2013/payswarm-journals/
> >
>
>


-- 
Shane P. McCarron
Managing Director, Applied Testing and Technology, Inc.