- From: Shane McCarron <ahby@aptest.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 09:05:47 -0700
- To: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
- Cc: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAOk_reFxqKJVoY=G4=naKXwTNkRNSF8tepMnOauRASh+v1Udwg@mail.gmail.com>
+1 On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 8:48 AM, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>wrote: > On Mar 17, 2013, at 6:30 PM, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> > wrote: > > > This is a straw poll to decide whether RDFa WG members believe that the > > HTML+RDFa 1.1 specification is ready to proceed to Proposed > > Recommendation. Note that there still may be minor changes to the > > specification based on last-minute input, but those changes will be > > non-substantial or editorial. The purpose of this straw poll is to see > > if each RDFa WG member believes that there are no outstanding issues > > that need to be addressed before we go to PR. The current PR-prepped > > document can be found here: > > > > http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/sources/rdfa-in-html/Overview-src.html > > > > The PR transition documentation can be found here: > > > > http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/wiki/Html-rdfa-1.1-pr-overview > > > > This poll is about whether or not the document is complete. There will > > be a separate straw poll in a week or two to actually move the document > > to the PR stage. > > > > PROPOSAL: Work on HTML+RDFa 1.1 is complete and the document is ready to > > proceed to PR. > > +1 > > > -- manu > > > > -- > > Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny) > > Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. > > blog: Aaron Swartz, PaySwarm, and Academic Journals > > http://manu.sporny.org/2013/payswarm-journals/ > > > > > -- Shane P. McCarron Managing Director, Applied Testing and Technology, Inc.
Received on Monday, 18 March 2013 16:06:22 UTC