Checking prefix.cc: * w3p: common for <http://prov4j.org/w3p/> and <http://purl.org/provenance/> * rec: common for <http://purl.org/ontology/rec/core#> * tr: no usage reported. Cheers, Niklas On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote: > > > Alexandre Bertails wrote: > > On 06/23/2013 07:27 AM, Ivan Herman wrote: > >> The RDF file that are used internally usually use the 'rec' prefix for > this one. > >> But, well, *shrug*, that is not a strong argument... > > > > Why not "tr:" then? > > Works for me, too. > > Ivan > > > > > Alexandre. > > > >> > >> Ivan > >> > >> Shane McCarron wrote: > >>> In order to enhance the RDFa support in ReSpec, I am going to include > an > >>> indication of the specification status using the vocabulary > >>> at http://www.w3.org/2001/02pd/rec54 - see > http://www.w3.org/2001/02pd/rec54.n3 > >>> if you want to view one version. > >>> > >>> My plan is to use the prefix 'w3p' for this unless there is an > existing commonly > >>> used prefix for this vocabulary. If anyone has an opinion on this, > please don't > >>> hesitate to chime in. > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Shane P. McCarron > >>> Managing Director, Applied Testing and Technology, Inc. > >> > > > > > > -- > Ivan Herman, W3C > Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ > mobile: +31-641044153 > http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf#me >
Received on Sunday, 23 June 2013 13:11:23 UTC