Alexandre Bertails wrote: > On 06/23/2013 07:27 AM, Ivan Herman wrote: >> The RDF file that are used internally usually use the 'rec' prefix for this one. >> But, well, *shrug*, that is not a strong argument... > > Why not "tr:" then? Works for me, too. Ivan > > Alexandre. > >> >> Ivan >> >> Shane McCarron wrote: >>> In order to enhance the RDFa support in ReSpec, I am going to include an >>> indication of the specification status using the vocabulary >>> at http://www.w3.org/2001/02pd/rec54 - see http://www.w3.org/2001/02pd/rec54.n3 >>> if you want to view one version. >>> >>> My plan is to use the prefix 'w3p' for this unless there is an existing commonly >>> used prefix for this vocabulary. If anyone has an opinion on this, please don't >>> hesitate to chime in. >>> >>> -- >>> Shane P. McCarron >>> Managing Director, Applied Testing and Technology, Inc. >> > > -- Ivan Herman, W3C Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf#me
Received on Sunday, 23 June 2013 12:50:19 UTC