- From: Stéphane Corlosquet <scorlosquet@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 11:31:28 -0500
- To: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
- Cc: RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAGR+nnEgHCF6tMnTv6qkZOEuZf3P6Jb43r2iD0egrFGr_vQb3w@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>wrote: > On Jan 17, 2013, at 5:03 PM, Stéphane Corlosquet <scorlosquet@gmail.com> > wrote: > > http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-in-html/#additional-rdfa-processing-rules > > "If no datatype is specified, and the value does not match any of the > automatically detected xsd datatypes, a plain literal must be generated > with the associated language of the node, if available. " > > Could we be more precise regarding datatype here, and use "datatype > attribute" instead of datatype. I'm particularly interested in the case > where there is an empty datatype attribute with @datetime. > > to give more context, I found this part of the spec not very clear while working on the easyrdf RDFa parser. in other words, what does "no datatype" means? does it include the scenario when there is no datatype attribute and also when there is an empty datatype attribute? or the former only? then what happens in the case of the later? It seems to me that a plain literal could be generated when there is an empty @datatype (in line with RDFA-CORE). To make a concrete proposal, add "If an empty datatype is present" to the second sentence: [[[ If datatype is specified, it must take precedence. If no datatype is specified, and the value does not match any of the automatically detected xsd datatypes, a plain literal must be generated with the associated language of the node, if available. ]]] would become [[[ If datatype is specified, it must take precedence. If an empty datatype is present, or if no datatype is specified and the value does not match any of the automatically detected xsd datatypes, a plain literal must be generated with the associated language of the node, if available. ]]] Steph. > > +1 > > Gregg > > -- > Steph. > > > > -- Steph.
Received on Thursday, 17 January 2013 16:32:00 UTC