- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2013 10:51:13 +0100
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Cc: RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <B08A5A4D-317B-4061-A78C-94FCAED0FAF7@w3.org>
On Jan 7, 2013, at 03:40 , Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > ISSUE-147: Preserve markup by default > http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/147 > > We are trying to get Sebastian on an RDFa WG telecon so that we can > discuss this issue with him in more depth. However, a number of the WG > members have voiced their reservations about changing this behavior in > HTML+RDFa 1.1. > > PROPOSAL: Do not change the HTML+RDFa 1.1 rules to preserve markup by > default. > Regardless of the fact that this issue had been discussed ad nauseam before the publication of RDFa 1.1 Core, I have not seen enough evidence justifying the introduction of such a major incompatibility between RDFa 1.1. Core and XHTML+RDFa 1.1 on the one hand, and HTML5+RDFa on the other. So +1 to keep what we have now. Ivan > -- manu > > -- > Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny) > Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. > blog: The Problem with RDF and Nuclear Power > http://manu.sporny.org/2012/nuclear-rdf/ > ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: smime.p7s
Received on Monday, 7 January 2013 09:51:37 UTC