- From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
- Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 08:31:05 -0700
- To: Reece Dunn <msclrhd@googlemail.com>
- Cc: Stéphane Corlosquet <scorlosquet@gmail.com>, RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
On Apr 17, 2013, at 8:25 AM, Reece Dunn <msclrhd@googlemail.com> wrote: > On 17 April 2013 14:48, Stéphane Corlosquet <scorlosquet@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net> wrote: > On Apr 17, 2013, at 5:13 AM, Reece Dunn <msclrhd@googlemail.com> wrote: >> Is it possible to add these test cases to the EARL tests? > I would think we'd already have a similar test, but there may be something special about this particular form that's tickling the bug. > > Reece, you can check out the test suite source code at https://github.com/rdfa/rdfa-website, and if your test case isn't already covered, feel free to create a pull request. > > > Done. > > I have found that RDF::RDFa passes with @property+@datatype but fails with @property+@datatype+@content when the parent element has an @lang specified. You can file issues on RDF:RDFa at http://github.com/ruby-rdf/rdf-rdfa/issues. But, I'll look at this later today. Generally, if multiple implementations do different things, it implies that there is a missing test. I'll look into this in more detail later today. Gregg > Thanks, > - Reece
Received on Wednesday, 17 April 2013 15:31:36 UTC