- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 07:05:48 +0200
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Cc: RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>, "Michael(tm) Smith" <mike@w3.org>, Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.com>
On Sep 3, 2012, at 16:43 , Manu Sporny wrote: > On 09/03/2012 12:12 AM, Ivan Herman wrote: >> Per issue 126: I agree with your conclusions, ie, xmlns may issue >> warnings. It is a deprecated and not-advised feature anyway, >> particularly at odd with HTML5, so this is perfectly justified imho. >> B.t.w., my implementation does generate such warnings already (when >> warnings are requested, that is, not by default). > > The issue isn't about whether or not to throw warnings... it is about > whether or not an HTML5+RDFa conformance checker may throw /errors/ if > it sees xmlns:. Ah, sorry! _For HTML5_, I am not hostile going that far, simply because I can imagine many HTML5 tools now or in the future, would indeed have problem with xmlns. Ivan > > -- manu > > -- > Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny) > Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. > blog: Which is better - RDFa Lite or Microdata? > http://manu.sporny.org/2012/mythical-differences/ > ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Tuesday, 4 September 2012 05:06:13 UTC