- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 10:43:00 -0400
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- CC: RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>, "Michael(tm) Smith" <mike@w3.org>, Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.com>
On 09/03/2012 12:12 AM, Ivan Herman wrote: > Per issue 126: I agree with your conclusions, ie, xmlns may issue > warnings. It is a deprecated and not-advised feature anyway, > particularly at odd with HTML5, so this is perfectly justified imho. > B.t.w., my implementation does generate such warnings already (when > warnings are requested, that is, not by default). The issue isn't about whether or not to throw warnings... it is about whether or not an HTML5+RDFa conformance checker may throw /errors/ if it sees xmlns:. -- manu -- Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny) Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: Which is better - RDFa Lite or Microdata? http://manu.sporny.org/2012/mythical-differences/
Received on Monday, 3 September 2012 14:43:37 UTC