- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2012 13:35:06 -0500
- To: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
- Cc: W3C RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Exactly! ivan On Nov 8, 2012, at 11:38 , Gregg Kellogg wrote: > On Nov 8, 2012, at 8:19 AM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote: > >> (Having just had a chat with Ralph...) >> >> We decided that a processor may issue a warning if a prefix redefines one that is in the initial context. But we may want to go a little bit further: if, at any point, a prefix redefines one that is already in scope, a warning should be issued, too. Ie, that situation should not be restricted to the initial context case. >> >> I think that would be a useful extension of our resolution. > > +1 > > That actually makes it easier to implement too, as I don't need to detect which redefinitions are for the initial context, and which for another prefix definition. > > Gregg > >> Ivan >> >> >> ---- >> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead >> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ >> mobile: +31-641044153 >> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf >> >> >> >> >> >> > > ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Thursday, 8 November 2012 18:35:36 UTC