- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 22:52:44 -0500
- To: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
- CC: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, W3C RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
On 11/08/2012 11:38 AM, Gregg Kellogg wrote: >> We decided that a processor may issue a warning if a prefix >> redefines one that is in the initial context. But we may want to go >> a little bit further: if, at any point, a prefix redefines one that >> is already in scope, a warning should be issued, too. Ie, that >> situation should not be restricted to the initial context case. >> >> I think that would be a useful extension of our resolution. > > +1 > > That actually makes it easier to implement too, as I don't need to > detect which redefinitions are for the initial context, and which for > another prefix definition. +1 -- manu -- Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny) Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: The Problem with RDF and Nuclear Power http://manu.sporny.org/2012/nuclear-rdf/
Received on Friday, 9 November 2012 03:53:14 UTC