- From: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 19:29:28 +0100
- To: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
- Cc: W3C RDFWA WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
On Thu, 17 May 2012 22:34:07 -0400 Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net> wrote: > I added your processor definition to the list, and generated a bunch > of EARL reports for you: > > http://rdfa.info/earl-reports/rdf-rdfa-parser-rdfa1.1-xml.html > http://rdfa.info/earl-reports/rdf-rdfa-parser-rdfa1.1-xhtml.html > http://rdfa.info/earl-reports/rdf-rdfa-parser-rdfa1.1-xhtml5.html > http://rdfa.info/earl-reports/rdf-rdfa-parser-rdfa1.1-svg.html I've integrated an EARL output feature into my test harness... https://bitbucket.org/tobyink/p5-rdf-rdfa-parser/src/tip/meta/earl Are those reports sufficient to auto-generate http://rdfa.info/earl-reports/, or do you need more detail in there? -- Toby A Inkster <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk> <http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
Received on Saturday, 19 May 2012 18:27:41 UTC