- From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
- Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 22:34:07 -0400
- To: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- CC: W3C RDFWA WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
On May 17, 2012, at 2:39 PM, Toby Inkster wrote: > On Thu, 17 May 2012 10:11:31 -0400 > Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net> wrote: > >> Toby, do you have a distiller endpoint we could add to the test suite? > > This should work, substituting in host language and RDFa version as > appropriate... > > http://buzzword.org.uk/2012/rdfa-distiller/?host=html5&version=1.1&format=rdfxml&url= > > If the test harness can't handle, substituting parameters in the URL > string, you should be able to leave it out and it will attempt to > auto-detect by media type and the @version attribute. However, that may > not be sufficient for, say, XHTML1 versus XHTML5. It doesn't do this kind of substitution now, but we could consider that in the future. You should be able to do content detection based on a combination of content type, doctype and presence or absence of @version. > I seem to get more failures via the test harness than I do running the > suite from the command line. Often clicking a red "FAIL" a couple more > times will turn it into a green "PASS". I think the version of Ruby Manu's running has some problems that periodically cause it to take an exception; persistence pays off, as you've noticed. It would be great to get that solved. I added your processor definition to the list, and generated a bunch of EARL reports for you: http://rdfa.info/earl-reports/rdf-rdfa-parser-rdfa1.1-xml.html http://rdfa.info/earl-reports/rdf-rdfa-parser-rdfa1.1-xhtml.html http://rdfa.info/earl-reports/rdf-rdfa-parser-rdfa1.1-xhtml5.html http://rdfa.info/earl-reports/rdf-rdfa-parser-rdfa1.1-svg.html You're also included in the rollup report: http://rdfa.info/earl-reports/ Gregg > -- > Toby A Inkster > <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk> > <http://tobyinkster.co.uk> >
Received on Friday, 18 May 2012 02:35:06 UTC