- From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
- Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 22:50:02 -0400
- To: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- CC: W3C RDFWA WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
I updated my processor to handle embedded RDF/XML and to parse the content of script elements having an @type which matches a content-type of an available RDF parser (typically text/turtle, but why not application/ld+json?). I also added support for putting extracted triples in a named graph based on using any @id value of the script element as a fragid on the document location. Gregg On May 17, 2012, at 7:09 AM, Gregg Kellogg wrote: > Well, if we're open to having tests that span formats, was should consider parsing Turtle marked up using <script type="application/turtle"> within HTML, at least when the Turtle spec is more settled. > > I hadn't considered the embedded RDF/XML before, but it should be easy enough to add to my parser. > > Gregg Kellogg > > Sent from my iPad > > On May 17, 2012, at 3:33 AM, "Toby Inkster" <tai@g5n.co.uk> wrote: > >> <test-cases/0310> dc:contributor "Toby Inkster"; >> dc:title "Embedded chunks of RDF/XML"; >> a test:TestCase; >> rdfatest:rdfaVersion "rdfa1.0", "rdfa1.1"; >> test:classification test:required; # ?! >> test:expectedResults "true"^^xsd:boolean; >> rdfatest:hostLanguage "svgtiny1.2", "svg"; >> test:informationResourceInput <test-cases/0310.html>; >> test:informationResourceResults <test-cases/0310.sparql>; >> test:purpose "Tests that embedded RDF/XML is added to same graph."; >> test:specificationReference >> "http://www.w3.org/TR/SVGTiny12/metadata.html#Introduction >> says 'an RDF processor should combine them into the same graph'" . >> >> -- >> Toby A Inkster >> <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk> >> <http://tobyinkster.co.uk> >> >> <0310.sparql> >> <0310.txt> >
Received on Friday, 18 May 2012 02:50:42 UTC