- From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
- Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 10:09:28 -0400
- To: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- CC: W3C RDFWA WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Well, if we're open to having tests that span formats, was should consider parsing Turtle marked up using <script type="application/turtle"> within HTML, at least when the Turtle spec is more settled. I hadn't considered the embedded RDF/XML before, but it should be easy enough to add to my parser. Gregg Kellogg Sent from my iPad On May 17, 2012, at 3:33 AM, "Toby Inkster" <tai@g5n.co.uk> wrote: > <test-cases/0310> dc:contributor "Toby Inkster"; > dc:title "Embedded chunks of RDF/XML"; > a test:TestCase; > rdfatest:rdfaVersion "rdfa1.0", "rdfa1.1"; > test:classification test:required; # ?! > test:expectedResults "true"^^xsd:boolean; > rdfatest:hostLanguage "svgtiny1.2", "svg"; > test:informationResourceInput <test-cases/0310.html>; > test:informationResourceResults <test-cases/0310.sparql>; > test:purpose "Tests that embedded RDF/XML is added to same graph."; > test:specificationReference > "http://www.w3.org/TR/SVGTiny12/metadata.html#Introduction > says 'an RDF processor should combine them into the same graph'" . > > -- > Toby A Inkster > <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk> > <http://tobyinkster.co.uk> > > <0310.sparql> > <0310.txt>
Received on Thursday, 17 May 2012 14:10:33 UTC