- From: Dave Beckett <dave@dajobe.org>
- Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 14:27:49 -0700
- To: public-rdfa-wg@w3.org
Every link I can find such as from the RDFA WG space at
http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/wiki/Main_Page
goes to this website http://rdfa.info/test-suite/
I would like to see something on w3.org in an easy to grab form - list of
urls, manifest, tarball, zip or just a browsable webspace of files.
It's not clear to me what are the definitive tests.
Right now I've relied on a 'fetch-tests' script from the librdfa GIT
repository which has a hand-coded list of tests. This is probably good
but how can I tell?
Once I get that far, *then* I can ask why RDFA 1.0 test 0209 is expected
to pass :)
Test input:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<title>Test 0209</title>
<base href="http://example.org/"/>
</head>
<body>
<!-- @prefix should be ignored in the RDFa 1.0 case -->
<div about ="#me" prefix="foaf: http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" >
<p property="foaf:name">Ivan Herman</p>
</div>
</body>
</html>
Expected RDFa 1.0 triples (0209.sparql) seem to be:
<http://example.org/#me> <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/name> "Ivan Herman" .
but I don't see how, if @prefix is RDFA 1.0 only.
Dave
Received on Wednesday, 16 May 2012 21:28:15 UTC