- From: Dave Beckett <dave@dajobe.org>
- Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 14:27:49 -0700
- To: public-rdfa-wg@w3.org
Every link I can find such as from the RDFA WG space at http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/wiki/Main_Page goes to this website http://rdfa.info/test-suite/ I would like to see something on w3.org in an easy to grab form - list of urls, manifest, tarball, zip or just a browsable webspace of files. It's not clear to me what are the definitive tests. Right now I've relied on a 'fetch-tests' script from the librdfa GIT repository which has a hand-coded list of tests. This is probably good but how can I tell? Once I get that far, *then* I can ask why RDFA 1.0 test 0209 is expected to pass :) Test input: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <!DOCTYPE html> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <title>Test 0209</title> <base href="http://example.org/"/> </head> <body> <!-- @prefix should be ignored in the RDFa 1.0 case --> <div about ="#me" prefix="foaf: http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" > <p property="foaf:name">Ivan Herman</p> </div> </body> </html> Expected RDFa 1.0 triples (0209.sparql) seem to be: <http://example.org/#me> <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/name> "Ivan Herman" . but I don't see how, if @prefix is RDFA 1.0 only. Dave
Received on Wednesday, 16 May 2012 21:28:15 UTC