- From: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 11:56:01 +0100
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Cc: W3C RDFWA WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
On Mon, 14 May 2012 12:52:29 +0200 Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote: > There are significant changes under way in RDFa 1.1 on this. > Essentially, on the RDF lexical value side, the requirement of C14N > will be gone, any well formed XML fragment is fine (and the equality > of RDF Literals will be pushed down to the value space of the > literal). Yay! But my main point is about the test suite for RDFa 1.0, where test case 0212 contradicts the old 0011 and the RDFa 1.0 spec. -- Toby A Inkster <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk> <http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
Received on Monday, 14 May 2012 10:54:27 UTC