- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2012 21:25:57 -0500
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Cc: RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
It was indeed a reponse to Tab. That being said, even if he maintains his objection, ie, does not find this solution satisfactory, my proposal would be to add this nevertheless as a good thing to have no matter what... Ivan --- Ivan Herman Tel:+31 641044153 http://www.ivan-herman.net (Written on mobile, sorry for brevity and misspellings...) On 2 Dec 2012, at 20:21, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote: > On 12/02/2012 03:26 PM, Ivan Herman wrote: >> great. >> >> Just cursory look at the differences: didn't we decide that, if an >> element overrides an inherited curie prefix locally via a @prefix, a >> warning should be generated into the processor graph? That would >> also automatically include a warning if a prefix from the initial >> context is overwritten. I do not see that in the new draft. > > Ah yes, we did. I remember thinking that while editing the documents, > and then convinced myself that I didn't need to do that just yet as we > haven't heard back from Tab yet. We may need to make more changes on > that particular issue based on Tab's response (as the issue remains open). > > I'll add that text in the next round of edits. > > -- manu > > -- > Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny) > Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. > blog: The Problem with RDF and Nuclear Power > http://manu.sporny.org/2012/nuclear-rdf/ >
Received on Monday, 3 December 2012 02:26:24 UTC