- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 10:14:14 -0400
- To: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
- CC: RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
On 05/28/2011 10:29 PM, Jonathan Rees wrote: > I don't quite get this. The language in the 31 March version is "have > not yet caught up" but your decision at the meeting says to remove the > words "at present" - and these words do not occur in the document. The "at present" language exists in the latest Editor's Draft, which is what you made your latest comments against: http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/sources/rdfa-core/Overview-src.html We will contact you when the latest editor's draft has removed the "at present" language. -- manu -- Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny) President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: PaySwarm Developer Tools and Demo Released http://digitalbazaar.com/2011/05/05/payswarm-sandbox/
Received on Sunday, 29 May 2011 14:14:52 UTC